Friday, March 23, 2012

The Plight of the Introvert [A Rant]

"You are not an introvert."

I hear this a lot, from otherwise completely well-meaning and understanding people. I get this from people who I trust to mentor me, from people who I've known since I arrived at this school nearly four years ago. I talk too much to be an introvert, perhaps, or I spend too much time in groups. I don't sit back and silently observe the proceedings like the other introverts in the group.

Unfortunately, perhaps, introversion and extraversion are not binary opposites. They not even a spectrum. They are simply ways of describing how a person functions in large group settings. Extraverts will continue to crave more and more group interaction, while introverts, though perfectly happy in many cases to interact with a large group, will quickly tire of the group and desire more focused interaction.

Unfortunately, our society is built around large groups and public interaction. If one tries to build more focused times for interaction, it's usually looked upon as being "antisocial" or in cases where the introvert is more desperate or less subtle about how they go about looking for that interaction, even "creepy"

So introverts are faced with a choice. For some, a satisfactory solution is to hover at the fringes of these large social events, meeting other introverts and then remaining on the fringe being quiet, reserved, and polite, and then leaving early to be alone.

However, some of us can't do alone. We also can't do large groups well. We can adapt, to a point, but it's not natural for us. So our next best option is to come into the groups looking for one-on-one conversations. However, when we try to draw people into these one-on-one or small-group interactions, we are accused of being "anti-social," as if being "social" were the highest virtue of a relationship. So we try to maintain these singular or small-group relationships within the context of larger groups, with varying degrees of success. But this is far from satisfactory.

The plight is worsened by trying to explain it, in most cases. My attempts to explain my needs for interaction to people are usually thwarted by the assumption of a false dichotomy. Either one wants to interact with people, in which case the more the merrier, or one does not, in which case they may as well sit at home and read, play video games, knit, or whatever else those weird people do. But the problem here is that I don't want to interact with more, but I also don't want to interact with no one. There is some ε which is the ideal number of people to interact with at once. It's certainly less than 10, usually less that 7, and quite commonly 1 or 2, depending on the person, their mood, and the circumstances.

Some introverts resort to staying at home and seem satisfied. The harder part is for those of us who really, really do crave interaction with others. The only place to get it is in the massive groups which make up what our society deems "social" events, so we go. But people see how we've adapted and assume that because we put on a bright face (because, you know, looking unhappy at a party is quite conducive to the goal of interacting with people), we're perfectly happy to be in the middle of everything. Then when we finally crash and have no energy left to exert in interacting with a large group, people assume that something must have happened, otherwise why would we leave? We were so happy!

So what can you do for the introvert in your life? Take time out to visit them, perhaps go to a bar or their apartment with one or two others. Take time to talk about deep and important things. When they are in large groups, take the time to sit down and engage them in meaningful conversation. When they exit the group, don't assume they are bumming out. Offer less crowded company. Any introvert in a group larger than 10 people is exerting tremendous energy to avoid intruding on the enjoyment of those who really do like such groups. Pay attention to the signs that somebody might prefer something a little deeper, and give them an opportunity for that interaction

tl;dr Just because we talk a lot and interact in large groups doesn't make us happy there or mean that we aren't introverts

P.S. The pronoun "we" is used under the assumption that I am not the only one faced with this difficulty.

11 comments:

  1. You're not the only one. I have the same problem, and I'm fortunate that by and large I move in circles which I can escape from when necessary. Sometimes people do take it badly when I refuse to go to some noisy gathering, and sometimes people do think I'm rude and standoffish and disconnected, but this only really seems to be a problem with potential boyfriends. Even the introverts, because I don't open up to people very quickly. That may be a different issue of course.

    ReplyDelete
  2. justified "we", you are not !

    I get "you are not an introvert" all the time as well. I tend to think of it like this- I have a small appetite for people- I dont like a lot of them, but I still need to eat. And since its a rarer occasion, I like a quality, hearty meal.

    just read this article this morning actually its pretty good ish: http://jerrybrito.org/post/6114304704/top-ten-myths-about-introverts?1d4ef638

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, it's even more fundamental than "group dynamics", although that is a decent enough explanation.

    The core differentiation from a neuroscience perspective, is related to the way an introvert versus an extrovert, processes incoming information.

    It's also related to the number of conceptual objects an extrovert or introvert can entertain at a given time.

    Introverts get exhausted simply because they've acquired too much new data, and they need more time to process than an extrovert.

    It's also the reason why introverts suck at communication naturally and extroverts are better at it. E's have faster judgements but not as deep generally speaking.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "We" is accurate. My wife is definitely an introvert of this stripe.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you are after a better way at explaining your situation, then maybe you should take a look at Socionics (essentially, this is an extension to MBTI). I'm not an expert on this stuff -- by any means -- bit it seems like what you are talking about is the dichotomy between introverted and extroverted ethics.

    Extroverted ethics is all about emotionally charged interaction. As it is most receptive to positive/negative energy of a collective rather than about concrete 1 on 1 connections, people strong in Fe tend to enjoy socialising in large groups.
    http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Fe

    Introverted ethics values one on one interpersonal connections and is very good at creating and keeping such ties. Because people strong in Fi have such a strong understanding of the connections between people, they also tend to have a very strict set of morals that they use to protect the connections that are dear to them.
    http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Fi

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for writing down exactly what I feel :) I too tend to search for someone to start a meaningful long discussion with at most events, and if I don't manage to find someone, I always leave early. Theres just no point in being there, I could just as well go home / back to the hotel and, uh sleep. Or daydream about things from my imagination, I do that all the time anyways, even during work, I need this mental break. And yet, I'm still the most productive engineer on the team.


    I always imagine how it would be to have this special someone which likes deep discussions just as much as I do, and who also constantly thinks about her surroundings and the world she lives in.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like your article, however I disagree with that you either have to interact with large groups OR stay home alone.

    It's perfectly fine, and generally a simple matter to interact with smaller groups -- see dating sites/local clubs/etc. for ideas.

    The problem isn't finding the interaction, it's finding 'quality' interaction. It can be so difficult and frustrating that I tend to think that introverts tend toward simply being alone as it avoids the time spent wading through numerous meaningless interactions to find a the more rare meaningful interaction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have this problem myself. In my case, it's related to my Asperger's Syndrome... noisy environments are uncomfortable, and the mental stress of trying to "fit in" to a conversation involving more than one other person wears me out. It's so much easier to figure out whose turn it is to talk when you only have to think about one other person.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting. This introvert can talk and talk and talk about subjects of depth and interest to me, but the small talk, mingle with the group thing... no way.

    My solution is to invite individuals out for coffee or lunch, friends or people I think I might like to get to know better. It usually only takes once to find out if you click or not. If the other person is an extrovert who will ask me questions with some depth, we're in for a great time together.

    People often accuse me of not being an introvert because I am comfortable speaking in front of large groups (note the in front of) and speaking up in small group discussions of interest.

    BTW I most certainly take issue with the statement that extroverts are better communicators than introverts. Most writers and many pastors are introverts, and I've served in both capacities.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh Chunk, I believe those are the reasons you and I were sitting around our high school classrooms chatting about things the others thought were weird. Miss ya buddy!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Very well said, and quite true for me as well.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. I will try to get to them quickly. Off-topic or obscene comments, name-calling, and destructive criticism will all vanish into the void.

Disagree with me all you want, but keep it respectful towards me and everyone else.